Friday, July 30, 2010

Breaking the Potato Paradigm with Summer Squash

I love potatoes. I can go through a bag of potato chips by myself no problem. I've been known to have fourths on mashed potatoes on several occasions. And I love hashbrowns with my breakfast. Unfortunately, there is really no way to eat potatoes in the large quantities due to their extremely high glycemic index.

What is the GI? It's not a marketing ploy--it's actually important, considering it gives you an idea of what kinds of foods, eaten in large quantities, abuse your system in a way that can eventually lead to Type-2 Diabetes. As someone who is already at risk aside from the apparent family tendency towards insulin resistance, I have to be aware of these things. If you are living in the U.S., where diabetes is the fastest growing disease in the country, so do you.

According to the Glycemic Index Foundation:

The glycemic index (GI) is a ranking of carbohydrates on a scale from 0 to 100 according to the extent to which they raise blood sugar levels after eating. Foods with a high GI are those which are rapidly digested and absorbed and result in marked fluctuations in blood sugar levels. Low-GI foods, by virtue of their slow digestion and absorption, produce gradual rises in blood sugar and insulin levels, and have proven benefits for health. Low GI diets have been shown to improve both glucose and lipid levels in people with diabetes (type 1 and type 2). They have benefits for weight control because they help control appetite and delay hunger. Low GI diets also reduce insulin levels and insulin resistance.

Recent studies from Harvard School of Public Health indicate that the risks of diseases such as type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease are strongly related to the GI of the overall diet. In 1999, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) recommended that people in industrialised countries base their diets on low-GI foods in order to prevent the most common diseases of affluence, such as coronary heart disease, diabetes and obesity. (http://www.glycemicindex.com/) 

That's right, we in the U.S. are such idiots about our foods that we suffer from diseases of "affluence." In other words, we're too rich to eat well.

Foods with a GI of over 55 are considered "high." Plain refined sugar has a GI of 84-100. Honey = 87. Jasmine white rice = 89. Of course, these ratings are more complicated than just a plain number, with lots of other aspects that affect their nutritional qualities and how they are digested. But generally speaking, it's safe to say that the higher the number, the smaller portions of those items you should be integrating into your daily diet.

A plain, baked Russet potato (like the kind you get from Idaho) has a GI of 94-111. That's right, some foods are so bad for you that they actually have to go over the standard GI scale to be measured. So much for hashbrowns.

I'll probably talk a lot about how to replace at least some of the potatoes in a recipe with some other vegetable with a lower GI and more nutritional value per serving. For today, though, I have to introduce a sublime recipe for zucchini latkes I've been messing around with. Like many summer squash (which you can easily substitute for this recipe), zucchini is amazing for you. To begin with, its primary ingredient is water, which explains why a 300 gram zucchini is only 50 calories. No one gets enough water, not even you, and even thought cooked zucchini certainly loses some of its water content, a lot of it is still present. Zucchini is also relatively high in fiber (you'll get none of that from a potato, I promise!), and actually include a few grams of protein per serving, along with a nice dose of Vitamins A and C. Hard to go wrong here.

Zucchini Latkes:


1 medium zucchini
1/2 sweet onion
1 egg, whisked
2 tablespoons of whole wheat flour
1/4 cup shredded parmesan cheese
1 tbsp grapeseed oil (or another neutral oil with a high burn temperature).
1 tsp curry powder
salt to taste
Pinch of cayenne

Topping:
1 tbsp plain (nonfat) Greek yogurt
Diced heirloom tomato

Chop or shred the zucchini into fine pieces, hashbrown style. A shredder attachment on a food processor works really well for this, but if you don't have one, just chop the zucchini as finely as you can. Chop the onion into the smallest pieces possible, so it blends well into the mixture.

In a large bowl, whisk together the egg and flour to make mild paste. Add the curry powder and cayenne and salt. Stir in the the zucchini, onion, and parmesan cheese. Other good cheese substitutes that produce very different flavors: crumbled goat cheese, feta, cotija, or paneer.

Heat the oil on a nonstick skillet at medium heat. Wait a few minutes so the surface is nice and hot--this is important if you want your latkes a little crispy. Once it's hot, scoop out spoonfuls of the mixture onto the frying pan.

Cook for 1-2 minutes before flipping to the other side to do the same. I usually make small latkes, about 1 1/2" diameter, which renders 8 latkes at approximately 45 calories per latke.


Top with a dollop of greek yogurt or cottage cheese and diced tomatoes. Excellent accompanied with eggs and a couple strips of bacon. Total calories for the meal below = 460. Not too shabby.


If you're dying for some potatoes and don't mind adding a few extra calories, you can shred some and mix with the zucchini. You'll need to cook them a little longer, so lower the heat proportionally so they don't burn in the process. Do yourself a favor and don't use russets! Smaller, more colorful potatoes tend to have a lower GI, so go with those. They are more flavorful anyway, so you can't lose.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Eating Well to Live Long??


6 weeks ago I celebrated my great-grandmother's 100th birthday. Her name is Edna (known as Nani), and it's a complete understatement to say that she is an inspiration to me. We threw a party for her, complete with a swing band. This is her, dancing. At her one-hundredth birthday. She's the sprite bird on the left.
 Nani dancing. c. Jolie Rodriguez Photography 2010

If you're not amazed, you should be. President Obama was; he sent her a birthday letter. According to the CDC, the average life expectancy at birth for people in the U.S. is 75 years for men, and 80 for women. In 1910, when Nani was born, it was more like 50. Between the ages of 65 and 85, the top three chronic health "issues" that inhibit activity are (in order): arthritic or other musculo-skeletal problems, heart/circulatory issues, and diabetes. According to my aunt and uncle (both doctors), the number one thing linked to all three health issues is extra poundage. After the age of 85, diabetes is superseded by vision and dementia. But let me clue you in on something else: that's because people with diabetes generally don't make it to 85.

I know I'm not the first person (or the last) to harp on the dearth of sufficient nutrition, exercise, preventative care, or dietary regulation in our country. Lots of people have written excellent books and articles on this issue. Other folks have made a killing selling fix-it diets on Oprah. While it's all right in the short term just to lose weight (if you can keep it off, that is), it's hard to know what kind of effects these uneven dietary guides have on consumers in the long run, other than allowing people to consume more empty foods each day. I suspect that my age group will be known as the Splenda generation, once our health stats demonstrate a leading cause of death of gigantic kidney stones developed from a build-up of artificial sweeteners.

Me perched on Tiger Mountain
I don't suffer from any of these conditions...and I don't want to. Here I am, in ardha matsyendrasana (half Lord of the Fishes Pose):

At 27, I'm in reasonably good health. I'm active, exercising nearly every day, and I eat fairly well. At just under 5'7", I weigh approximately 135 lbs, right smack-dab in the middle of what the CDC declares a "healthy" range of weight for my height: between 118 and 159 lbs. This seems like a pretty wide range to me, but I'm no specialist.

So, I'm "healthy," but am I my absolutely healthiest? No. Will I blow out 100 birthday candles? Couldn't tell. Like most Americans, I could stand to lose a few pounds, if only to help out my chronically aching knees and make it easier to do forearm stand on my disproportionately small shoulders. I exercise a lot, so I figured it was time to take a look at my eating habits and see if I could tweak a few things. If you know me, you know that I'm pretty dedicated to eating whole foods, and that I love to eat local when I can afford it on my graduate student budget. You also know that I have a huge sweet tooth and that I could live on cheese. And that once I get started, it's hard for me to stop :)

My yoga teacher informed me that 27 was the beginning of a new life cycle, so I thought this would be a prime time to evaluate, considering I just turned 27 a few weeks ago. I'm not only going to start counting calories, but I'm going to look at the break down of how much I eat of what kinds of foods each day. What you'll be reading here will be a kind of log of that process (albeit not daily), but not just a blog about calories. I think part of being healthy is giving yourself enough pleasure. I don't want to fool myself into eating artificially sweetened products as dessert or limiting myself to 99% fat-free turkey meatballs just to make a certain weight quota. I don't want to give up the good things in life, because it's obvious to me that a certain joie de vivre is just as necessary to making it to 100 as keeping my body in check.

This project is about getting to know my favorite foods (and finding new ones), learning how they really break down in terms of nutrition, and then finding ways to optimize their "health" factor without sacrificing good flavors or solid ingredients. Trial and error is obviously going to be my method...and I am always open to suggestions!

Here's to dancing at my 100th birthday party, and savoring every bite on the way!

Cheers!
Lauren